by Soter D'Souza
The recent outbursts by some Catholic politicians in Goa
against the Church and its priests for issuing the circular and advisory on
elections has come as a shock to the Catholic community. By doing so, these politicians
have actually played into the hands of the divisive forces for their personal
greed for power and will repent shortly. While these politicians look for
short-term gains, they remain terribly ignorant of the tactics and long-term
plans employed by the divisive forces that are so glaringly evident for those
who are willing to see the truth. The problem is that some Catholics ‘have eyes
but refuse to see, they have ears but refuse to hear and they have a mouth but
refuse to speak.’
Incidentally, the Church is in the period of Lent wherein
the events leading to Jesus being nailed on a cross and the immense suffering
inflicted on him due to the betrayal by Judas and the denial of truth and
justice by those in Authority are recalled. At this moment, one hardly expected
some Catholic politicians to misrepresent the stand of the Church in regards to
its intervention in politics and its defense of Secularism. When the Church
Circular and Advisory has steered clear of ascribing communalism to any
particular individual or political organisation and has raised several other
vital issues of oppression and discrimination, yet some Catholic politicians in
their attempt to protect their vested political interests and justify their
political preferences have actually connived with divisive forces in unleashing
misinformation against the Church.
For Catholics in politics, their personal life cannot be
dissociated from their political life. As much as it is the duty of the priests
to uphold certain values, the teachings of the Church urges Lay Catholics in
politics to “combat injustice and oppression, arbitrary domination and
intolerance by individuals and political parties, and they must do so with
integrity and wisdom.” Catholic politicians are required to make efforts to be
properly informed. Those of them who accuse the Church of interfering in
politics and unjustly questioning the secular credentials of particular
political parties, need to first be thoroughly informed about the facts. One’s
ignorance about incidents of communalism cannot be construed as its absence.
We need to remember that the advisories issued by the Church
are not based on fairy tales and is not about paid propaganda as resorted to by
corporate-communal forces. It is not necessarily priests alone who are involved
in preparing such advisories; there is a process of research and consultation
that goes into preparing such an advisory. The loud propaganda and whisper
campaign that ‘all is well’ and ‘all is shinning’ which gets unleashed to drown
the cries of injustice or the manipulation of justice systems on issues of
discrimination and violence does not amount to absence of communalism. A
political marriage of convenience,
involving a bunch of politicians from the minority community or certain
benefits enjoyed by some privileged sections from the minority community, is not necessarily proof of the secular
ideology of a political party.
These Catholic politicians who accuse the Church of
instilling fear and suspicion in the minds of minorities against a particular
political party perhaps suffer from induced amnesia wherein they seem ignorant
of the fact that even a sizeable section
within the majority community are also concerned about the erosion of secular
values undertaken by certain political forces. The hide and seek played with
citizens by political parties when it comes to admitting their links with
certain parental bodies known for propagating divisive ideologies and the
politics of exclusion, is in itself sufficient cause for suspicion. It is said that, “there cannot be smoke
without a fire” and minorities are not
all that wrong in dubbing certain political organisations as communal.
Communalism is not only about riots. Propagating false information about a
particular community in an attempt to instigate and discriminate a particular community, like in the case of the controversial CD on the liberation
of Goa or the MoI issue, is also communalism. The denial of justice to victims
of injustice from a particular community and use of State power to harass or
suppress minority institutions is also communalism. And no one can deny that
such discrimination and intimidation against minorities does not exist in
States governed by a particular political party which some Catholic politicians
shamelessly try to defend in public.
The Goan community needs to be weary of such politicians who
put self above the community. One Catholic MLA even disclosed on a TV channel
about how he had a secret tie-up with a political party during the 2012
Assembly polls. If they can strike secret deals to get elected and ridicule the
wisdom of the Church in its assessment of the communal threat in politics, such
irresponsible and selfish politicians are a threat to the Goan community as
they could go to any length by collaborating with those forces that are
striving to abolish the civic liberties of citizens in this country.
No comments:
Post a Comment